sexta-feira, 1 de maio de 2026
O Petrogas-dólar: stratégia secreta dos EUA por detrás da guerra com Irão [Crónica da IIIª Guerra Mundial, Nº62]
sábado, 25 de abril de 2026
ARMAGEDÃO DA ECONOMIA MUNDIAL, SE DEIXARMOS [MICHAEL HUDSON]
sexta-feira, 24 de abril de 2026
David Stockman: A grande mentira sobre o Irão e a catástrofe no Golfo Pérsico
[Copiado da página de Doug Casey: ]
What is going on in the Persian Gulf is rotten beyond words.
The rogue madman in the Oval Office has detonated a conflagration there that could send the entire global economy and financial system spiraling into a catastrophe—and not just because or even mainly due to the 23 million barrels of oil per day at risk out of 105 million needed worldwide.
What’s really at risk is the underlying global financial system. The latter is a veritable house of cards sitting upon a mountain of debt, leverage, and speculative excess. So it may not have the capacity or resilience to withstand a sudden $200 per barrel oil shock.
Yet and yet. The whole insanely reckless act of launching a sweeping military attack on a nation of 90 million people that had zero capacity to impose military harm on the home territory of the United States is predicated on one of the Great Big Stinking Lies of History—namely, that the Iranian regime is a uniquely evil stain on the face of the earth and has spent 47 years bringing injury, mayhem, and death to America and much of the region around it.
The truth, however, is that there’s nothing especially unique about Iran’s manifold sins at all. It’s just another run-of-the-mill authoritarian state run by a medieval theocracy that has imposed one of the most benighted tyrannies of modern times. Accordingly, it has brought untold hardships and miseries to its people, especially via the brutal ruffians of the IRGC.
But that’s mainly the unfortunate work of the clerics and their IRGC allies ruling inside its borders. When it comes to the outside world, Iran has invaded not a single neighboring country since 1979, and indeed not in the last 300 years before the mullahs.
At the same time, Iran was savagely attacked by Saddam Hussein with U.S. and European arms during the 1980s; it has been brutally sanctioned by Washington trade embargoes and economic warfare for the past 30 years; and for decades, it has also been relentlessly assaulted via Israeli assassination squads, saboteurs, and periodic missiles and bombs.
In fact, the whole "leading state sponsor of terror" slogan has more validity as a Bibi Netanyahu campaign theme than it does as an accurate description of the real world.
And, no, the "whadabout the proxies" canard doesn’t cut it, either. Not a single one of Iran’s so-called "proxies" in the region was concocted out of whole cloth by the mullahs as some kind of mercenary force recruited, trained, and financed by Tehran and artificially implanted in the soil of Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, and Gaza.
To the contrary, the first three of these represented Shiite populations, which aligned with their Shiite brethren in Iran out of confessional ties and due to the fact that they were imperiled in their home countries. After all, there was no Hezbollah until Israel invaded southern Lebanon in the early 1980s and imposed a harsh occupation that left tens of thousands dead, culminating in the genocidal atrocities at Sabra and Shatila.
Likewise, the late Assad government in Syria was Alawite, which is a Shiite branch, and had been at war with Israel off and on since 1967 under Bashar Assad and his father before him. Whatever the merits of its half-century-long struggle with the Israelis, the Assad regime didn’t need any new marching orders from Tehran to become a "proxy."
Even in the case of Yemen, the country has been divided and wracked by civil war conditions since the 1960s as regionally based Shiite and Sunni factions battled for power.
The Houthis, domiciled in the north and west of Yemen, of course, are Shiite and made an alliance with Tehran. Not surprisingly, the southern and eastern Sunni areas of the country were aligned with the Sunni monarchy of Saudi Arabia, which has waged war against the Houthis much of the time since 2015.
Finally, however evil the Hamas forces surely are, they were not born, bred, and raised by the mullahs. If anything, the Israeli-sponsored open-air prison in Gaza and five brutal episodes of "mowing the lawn" via vicious bombing campaigns since 2007 were more than enough to explain the rise of Hamas.
In fact, Hamas was mainly Sunni, not Shiite, and was aligned with Iran only out of having a common enemy. Even then, most of the suitcases full of cash that Netanyahu permitted to come into Gaza year after year before October 7th were Sunni money from the Gulf states, not Iranian proxy finance.
So, yes, there has been a goodly amount of conflict and violence in the region, but it was not robotically commanded by the Ayatollahs. It was deeply rooted in the indigenous conflicts of the region that long pre-dated the 1979 Islamic Revolution.
The common thread, of course, is that all four of these forces were indigenous to the region and had a beef with Israel, separate and apart from anything happening in Tehran. That’s mainly because each of these groups was directly attacked or demonized by Bibi Netanyahu for deep reasons of Israeli politics.
For instance, the only reason Hamas thrived as long as it did is that Bibi Netanyahu financed it via Qatar in order to weaken the Palestinian Authority. In turn, that cynical ploy was aimed at scuttling any eventual implementation of the Oslo Accords and a two-state solution on the grounds that the Palestinians were so divided and violent that there was "no one to negotiate with."
In any event, the gist of the 47-Year War on America Lie stems almost entirely from Israel’s ongoing battle with the four mislabeled "proxies" and Washington’s repeated interventions, funding, and international political and diplomatic support for Israel. And even then, taking sides in this manner had no benefit whatsoever for the homeland security of America.
Yet it was the unnecessary and avoidable fallout from consistently taking sides with Israel against these regional foes that gave rise to the hoary myth that Iran has murdered more than 1,000 Americans over the 47 years since the Revolution. Yet a simple fact check conducted by Grok 4 at our request debunks this endlessly chanted claim lock, stock, and barrel.
Here are the key realities:
- Not one of the 1,050 American deaths during this period occurred on American soil.
- Exactly 1,041 of these deaths occurred at the hands of alleged Iranian proxies versus only 9 attributable to the Iranian military or other government agencies.
- Fully 1,000 or 96% of the American deaths happened in the context of U.S. military deployments to the region and the resulting active wars and peacekeeping activities in Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, and adjacent territories and coastal waters.
That’s right. Not one of these U.S. military deployments from the Beirut Marine barracks forward was necessary for America’s homeland security. To the contrary, all were elective wars undertaken in pursuit of the imperatives of Empire.
Accordingly, the resulting deaths are due to putting American military and civilian personnel wrongfully in harm’s way—and most especially from taking sides in local and regional military conflicts that were none of Washington’s business.
In short, the 1,000 American deaths chant is completely and hideously wrong because these figures resulted from Washington-initiated military actions in the Mideast that were wholly unjustified and, consequently, put American lives in harm’s way against local people who had reason to defend themselves from actual or potential U.S. military assault.
Thus, while all of these deaths were tragic and unnecessary, the neocon exploitation and lies about them need to be subject to withering ridicule. That is to say, things that didn’t need to happen owing to Washington’s fault over nearly a half-century do not remotely amount to a casus belli in any rational world.
Indeed, even if you consider these unfortunate deaths as abstract statistics without context or blame, there is absolutely no cause to start a quasi-world war in the Persian Gulf, which supplies a crucial share of the world’s crude oil, refined petroleum, LPGs, liquefied natural gas, industrial sulfur, and helium crucial to semiconductor chip production, among others.
To the contrary, the unhinged madman domiciled in the all-powerful Oval Office has the region, the U.S., and the global economy on the edge of catastrophic upheaval based on an utterly untruthful narrative about 1,050 American deaths during the last 47 years that were far exceeded by the ordinary course accidents and hazards of daily life in America during that same period, such as fatalities from:
- Powered lawnmower accidents: 3,200 deaths.
- Bee stings: 3,900 deaths.
- Falling out of bed: 10,300 deaths.
- Visiting Mexico: 4,000 Americans murdered there.
- Lightning strikes: 2,000 deaths.
- Cardiac arrest during sex: 8,000 deaths.
sábado, 4 de abril de 2026
quinta-feira, 2 de abril de 2026
Resumo crítico da atuação de Trump
terça-feira, 24 de março de 2026
O SIONISMO TEM UM PROJETO DE DOMÍNIO DO MÉDIO ORIENTE (Crónica da IIIª Guerra Mundial nº58)
domingo, 22 de março de 2026
MOVIMENTAÇÃO ESTRATÉGICA DO IRÃO CONTRA OS EUA IRÁ MUDAR TUDO
Former ambassador for the UK Chris Murray is onto something when he asserts that Trump’s plan is, and was all along, to utterly destroy and defeat Iran:
The attack on Iran was always planned by Trump. He was not “bounced into it” by Israel. It had been in gestation for months. That fact had been held within a very tight circle to avoid both political opposition and institutional opposition from the US military and intelligence community.
…
Trump’s naval blockade of Venezuela’s oil has secured a US monopoly of its sale and distribution. As with Iraq, only US-approved contractors can buy the oil and payments are made to a Trump-controlled account in Qatar, from which revenue is given to the Venezuelan government entirely at Trump’s discretion.This audacious imperialist grab of the world’s largest oil reserve further insulated the USA against the effects of the forthcoming closure of the Strait of Hormuz.
Again, the narrative is being spun that Trump did not foresee the closure of the Strait by Iran. That is plainly a nonsense – every commentary on a potential Iran war for half a century has focused on the Strait of Hormuz. The only possible explanation is that Trump does not mind the closure.
…
Trump’s thrashing about to articulate objectives for the war in Iran is performative, a blind to cover his true and steadfast objective – simply the annihilation of Iran as a functioning state, the infliction of the maximum amount of death and infrastructural damage, the reduction of Iran to the condition of Libya.
…
Destruction of Iran on the scale envisaged will take years of hard pounding. Again, it is planned – you don’t ask Congress for an installment of $200 billion for a war you plan to wrap up in a month. Again, Trump’s taunts about having already won, objectives being achieved and about possibly finishing soon, are all just smoke and mirrors. The scale and horror of what is planned for Iran has to be obfuscated to limit a public revulsion that would be echoed in parts of the state apparatus.Netanyahu yesterday revealed an interesting part of the endgame – construction of an oil pipeline that brings Iran’s oil out to be shipped from a Mediterranean terminal in Israel. That is a breathtakingly audacious plan, but absolutely aligns with Netanyahu’s and Trump’s actions.
Let me encourage you to read Murray’s full argument
sexta-feira, 20 de março de 2026
domingo, 15 de março de 2026
Coronel Macgregor descreve a derrota americana no Irão
quarta-feira, 11 de março de 2026
Os princípios da guerra assimétrica
O prof. Jiang dá-nos uma lição magistral da guerra assimétrica que está a ser combatida pelos iranianos contra as forças militares conjugadas de EUA e Israel.
domingo, 8 de março de 2026
A QUESTÃO ERRADA SOBRE A GUERRA NO IRÃO
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Wrong Question about the War in IranAt its root, the assault on Iran is inseparable from the question of Palestine.Yakov M. Rabkin Much of the discussion surrounding the current war on Iran focuses on its potential outcome for the United States. One of the most frequently asked questions is whether Washington will suffer yet another loss of face in the Middle East. But this is the wrong question. Even if the war produces chaos and ultimately harms the United States and Europe—as earlier interventions in Iraq, Libya and Syria did—the more important issue is what benefit Israel, the war’s proponent and initiator, stands to gain. After all, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said he had been planning this war for 40 years. The reason for this is Iran’s principled stance on justice for the Palestinians. That commitment transcends religious divisions: Iran is predominantly Shia, while Palestinians are predominantly Sunni. Iranians and their allies in Lebanon and Yemen are prepared to die as martyrs, and many have already been killed by joint Israeli and American strikes. Yet the yearning for justice has proven to be both profound and resilient. Iran remains the principal stronghold of resistance to Israel. It not only decries Israel’s apartheid regime and genocide in Gaza but also supports armed resistance groups such as Hezbollah and Hamas. By contrast, almost all governments in the region are only opposed to Israel’s occupation and oppression of Palestine in principle, while cooperating with Israel in practice. Turkey is an important transit point for oil and gas supplied to Israel. Egypt has helped Israel isolate Gaza and starve its inhabitants. During the last Israeli attack on Iran in 2025, Jordanian and Saudi air defences protected Israel from incoming Iranian missiles. The United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan formalized relations with Israeli through the 2020 Abraham Accords. Elbit, an Israeli company, accounts for 12 percent of Morocco’s total arms imports, and other Arab regimes openly or tacitly purchase Israeli weapons and surveillance equipment. This pattern is exhibited by many other countries, particularly in the West. ----------------------------- PS1: Aquilo que muitos anti-capitalistas bem-intencionados não compreendem é a relação da luta de classes em cada país e região, com a luta global pela libertação das garras do suprematismo americano. As greves em portos do Mediterrâneo, dos trabalhadores portuários recusando carregar material de guerra para Israel, as manifestações de massas em variados países que pertencem à OTAN, o repúdio de parte significativa dos americanos sobre o desencadear desta guerra, tudo isso faz com que a classe política esteja mais hesitante em satisfazer os lóbis pró-sionistas e ceder às tendências autoritárias, no Ocidente. Em Espanha, o governo de Sanchez tem uma posição de princípio clara, sobre o genocídio palestiniano e sobre a guerra de agressão israelo-americana contra o Irão. Penso que - indiretamente - as posições oficiais de Espanha refletem o sentimento do povo espanhol, contrário a estas aventuras imperiais. |
quinta-feira, 5 de março de 2026
Conferência de Pepe Escobar: QUAL É O GRANDE JOGO NA ÁSIA CENTRAL?
E QUAL A RELAÇÃO COM A IIIª GUERRA MUNDIAL? *
