Mostrar mensagens com a etiqueta David Stockman. Mostrar todas as mensagens
Mostrar mensagens com a etiqueta David Stockman. Mostrar todas as mensagens

sexta-feira, 24 de abril de 2026

David Stockman: A grande mentira sobre o Irão e a catástrofe no Golfo Pérsico

 [Copiado da página de Doug Casey: ]





By David Stockman

What is going on in the Persian Gulf is rotten beyond words.

The rogue madman in the Oval Office has detonated a conflagration there that could send the entire global economy and financial system spiraling into a catastrophe—and not just because or even mainly due to the 23 million barrels of oil per day at risk out of 105 million needed worldwide.

What’s really at risk is the underlying global financial system. The latter is a veritable house of cards sitting upon a mountain of debt, leverage, and speculative excess. So it may not have the capacity or resilience to withstand a sudden $200 per barrel oil shock.

Yet and yet. The whole insanely reckless act of launching a sweeping military attack on a nation of 90 million people that had zero capacity to impose military harm on the home territory of the United States is predicated on one of the Great Big Stinking Lies of History—namely, that the Iranian regime is a uniquely evil stain on the face of the earth and has spent 47 years bringing injury, mayhem, and death to America and much of the region around it.

The truth, however, is that there’s nothing especially unique about Iran’s manifold sins at all. It’s just another run-of-the-mill authoritarian state run by a medieval theocracy that has imposed one of the most benighted tyrannies of modern times. Accordingly, it has brought untold hardships and miseries to its people, especially via the brutal ruffians of the IRGC.

But that’s mainly the unfortunate work of the clerics and their IRGC allies ruling inside its borders. When it comes to the outside world, Iran has invaded not a single neighboring country since 1979, and indeed not in the last 300 years before the mullahs.

At the same time, Iran was savagely attacked by Saddam Hussein with U.S. and European arms during the 1980s; it has been brutally sanctioned by Washington trade embargoes and economic warfare for the past 30 years; and for decades, it has also been relentlessly assaulted via Israeli assassination squads, saboteurs, and periodic missiles and bombs.

In fact, the whole "leading state sponsor of terror" slogan has more validity as a Bibi Netanyahu campaign theme than it does as an accurate description of the real world.

And, no, the "whadabout the proxies" canard doesn’t cut it, either. Not a single one of Iran’s so-called "proxies" in the region was concocted out of whole cloth by the mullahs as some kind of mercenary force recruited, trained, and financed by Tehran and artificially implanted in the soil of Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, and Gaza.

To the contrary, the first three of these represented Shiite populations, which aligned with their Shiite brethren in Iran out of confessional ties and due to the fact that they were imperiled in their home countries. After all, there was no Hezbollah until Israel invaded southern Lebanon in the early 1980s and imposed a harsh occupation that left tens of thousands dead, culminating in the genocidal atrocities at Sabra and Shatila.

Likewise, the late Assad government in Syria was Alawite, which is a Shiite branch, and had been at war with Israel off and on since 1967 under Bashar Assad and his father before him. Whatever the merits of its half-century-long struggle with the Israelis, the Assad regime didn’t need any new marching orders from Tehran to become a "proxy."

Even in the case of Yemen, the country has been divided and wracked by civil war conditions since the 1960s as regionally based Shiite and Sunni factions battled for power.

The Houthis, domiciled in the north and west of Yemen, of course, are Shiite and made an alliance with Tehran. Not surprisingly, the southern and eastern Sunni areas of the country were aligned with the Sunni monarchy of Saudi Arabia, which has waged war against the Houthis much of the time since 2015.

Finally, however evil the Hamas forces surely are, they were not born, bred, and raised by the mullahs. If anything, the Israeli-sponsored open-air prison in Gaza and five brutal episodes of "mowing the lawn" via vicious bombing campaigns since 2007 were more than enough to explain the rise of Hamas.

In fact, Hamas was mainly Sunni, not Shiite, and was aligned with Iran only out of having a common enemy. Even then, most of the suitcases full of cash that Netanyahu permitted to come into Gaza year after year before October 7th were Sunni money from the Gulf states, not Iranian proxy finance.

 

So, yes, there has been a goodly amount of conflict and violence in the region, but it was not robotically commanded by the Ayatollahs. It was deeply rooted in the indigenous conflicts of the region that long pre-dated the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

The common thread, of course, is that all four of these forces were indigenous to the region and had a beef with Israel, separate and apart from anything happening in Tehran. That’s mainly because each of these groups was directly attacked or demonized by Bibi Netanyahu for deep reasons of Israeli politics.

For instance, the only reason Hamas thrived as long as it did is that Bibi Netanyahu financed it via Qatar in order to weaken the Palestinian Authority. In turn, that cynical ploy was aimed at scuttling any eventual implementation of the Oslo Accords and a two-state solution on the grounds that the Palestinians were so divided and violent that there was "no one to negotiate with."

In any event, the gist of the 47-Year War on America Lie stems almost entirely from Israel’s ongoing battle with the four mislabeled "proxies" and Washington’s repeated interventions, funding, and international political and diplomatic support for Israel. And even then, taking sides in this manner had no benefit whatsoever for the homeland security of America.

Yet it was the unnecessary and avoidable fallout from consistently taking sides with Israel against these regional foes that gave rise to the hoary myth that Iran has murdered more than 1,000 Americans over the 47 years since the Revolution. Yet a simple fact check conducted by Grok 4 at our request debunks this endlessly chanted claim lock, stock, and barrel.

Here are the key realities:

  • Not one of the 1,050 American deaths during this period occurred on American soil.
  • Exactly 1,041 of these deaths occurred at the hands of alleged Iranian proxies versus only 9 attributable to the Iranian military or other government agencies.
  • Fully 1,000 or 96% of the American deaths happened in the context of U.S. military deployments to the region and the resulting active wars and peacekeeping activities in Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, and adjacent territories and coastal waters.

That’s right. Not one of these U.S. military deployments from the Beirut Marine barracks forward was necessary for America’s homeland security. To the contrary, all were elective wars undertaken in pursuit of the imperatives of Empire.

Accordingly, the resulting deaths are due to putting American military and civilian personnel wrongfully in harm’s way—and most especially from taking sides in local and regional military conflicts that were none of Washington’s business.

In short, the 1,000 American deaths chant is completely and hideously wrong because these figures resulted from Washington-initiated military actions in the Mideast that were wholly unjustified and, consequently, put American lives in harm’s way against local people who had reason to defend themselves from actual or potential U.S. military assault.

Thus, while all of these deaths were tragic and unnecessary, the neocon exploitation and lies about them need to be subject to withering ridicule. That is to say, things that didn’t need to happen owing to Washington’s fault over nearly a half-century do not remotely amount to a casus belli in any rational world.

Indeed, even if you consider these unfortunate deaths as abstract statistics without context or blame, there is absolutely no cause to start a quasi-world war in the Persian Gulf, which supplies a crucial share of the world’s crude oil, refined petroleum, LPGs, liquefied natural gas, industrial sulfur, and helium crucial to semiconductor chip production, among others.

To the contrary, the unhinged madman domiciled in the all-powerful Oval Office has the region, the U.S., and the global economy on the edge of catastrophic upheaval based on an utterly untruthful narrative about 1,050 American deaths during the last 47 years that were far exceeded by the ordinary course accidents and hazards of daily life in America during that same period, such as fatalities from:

  • Powered lawnmower accidents: 3,200 deaths.
  • Bee stings: 3,900 deaths.
  • Falling out of bed: 10,300 deaths.
  • Visiting Mexico: 4,000 Americans murdered there.
  • Lightning strikes: 2,000 deaths.
  • Cardiac arrest during sex: 8,000 deaths.


segunda-feira, 28 de fevereiro de 2022

UMA IMAGEM VALE MIL PALAVRAS...MAS AS PALAVRAS DE DAVID STOCKMAN SÃO INDISPENSÁVEIS





                                    williambanzai7

???? QUEM É QUE DISSE: «FUCK THE EU!» ????

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2022-02-26/picture-worth-1000-words


Em complemento, leia o artigo de David Stockman: The Land Where History Died, Part 1a


Os que hoje se indignam com os russos e Putin são os que encobriram, quando não aplaudiram, as barbaridades dos nazis ucranianos durante estes oito anos.

PS1: As palavras de Edward Curtin também são sensatas, oxalá que não sejam proféticas. Leia AQUI.



sexta-feira, 18 de setembro de 2020

«ECONOMIA DE CASINO» TORNOU-SE UMA METÁFORA DEMASIADO TÍMIDA ...

 


A «economia de casino», presidida pelos bancos centrais dos países ocidentais, com a FED (Reserva Federal dos EUA) à cabeça, passou a ser uma economia em roda livre, correndo para o precipício.

Com efeito, a constante criação monetária, engendrando um aumento brutal da folha de activos dos bancos centrais, acoplada com uma permanente repressão monetária, forçando juros próximos de zero e agora mesmo negativos, tem consequências graves e de longo prazo.
Por exemplo, a FED  expandiu a sua folha de activos de 4,2 triliões de dólares em Março deste ano, para 7,2 triliões à data de 10 de Junho. Para alguém não familiarizado com tais números astronómicos, isto pode não parecer demasiado preocupante, mas o caso muda de figura, se essa mesma pessoa souber que os primeiros 3 triliões de dólares, na folha de balanço da FED, demoraram quase um século a acumular-se: desde o início de 1914 até Março de 2013, segundo David Stockman. 
Infelizmente, o mesmo comportamento é observável nos outros grandes bancos centrais ocidentais. Tudo indica que a MMT «moderna teoria monetária», tomou controlo das mentes dos banqueiros centrais, uma teoria que afirma que não importa a quantidade de dinheiro que é despejado numa economia, que a criação monetária pode ser manejada como se se tratasse de um acelerador de um carro: ora aumentando um pouco mais, ora diminuindo a velocidade de criação monetária, consoante o estado da economia. 
Porém, nada disto é verdade. 
Mesmo antes da crise do COVID-19, multiplicavam-se, nas economias ocidentais, as falências, as empresas zombies, a estagnação ou mesmo contracção - em termos reais  - do PIB. 
Isto, apesar de - desde 2008 - ter sido constante a injecção de liquidez nas economias e a repressão das taxas de juro. Levou-se a redução ao absurdo, com taxas negativas em 70% dos empréstimos obrigacionistas nos países ocidentais.  
Não apenas os «remédios» não surtiam efeito, como a economia mostrava sinais de persistente fraqueza.
O objectivo de 2% de inflação é tão absurdo, que apenas uma opinião pública completamente anestesiada não se indigna quando bancos centrais e governos insistem em apontar isso como objectivo económico, «justificando» as medidas que são postas em prática. Pois bem; nem sequer esse famigerado «objectivo dos 2% de inflação» é atingido após 8 anos de persistentes esforços. 
A característica da loucura, já dizia Einstein, é aplicar sempre a mesma medida, a mesma fórmula, ensaio após ensaio, apesar de se verificar que ela não produz o resultado pretendido.
Eu acrescentaria que se trata de comportamento obsessivo-compulsivo, perfeitamente comum em determinado tipo de instituições: as instituições psiquiátricas.
O mundo está a assistir, impávido, ao destroçar final das divisas. O facto de se ouvir falar de que o dólar é mais forte ou mais fraco é apenas conversa fiada, pois TODAS as moedas «fiat» estão descendo até ao seu valor intrínseco, que é zero (*). 
A política de criação «non-stop» de divisas está na base da inflação, em todos os países. O que está em causa é a destruição do valor do dinheiro, ganho por biliões de trabalhadores e empresários, no mundo inteiro. 
A minha previsão, é que vamos assistir a uma espiral de inflação, a qual poderá transformar-se numa hiper-inflação. Ou seja, destroem completamente o valor dos bens monetários e financeiros.
Os bancos centrais e os governos sabem isso perfeitamente e contam com isso para o «Great Reset»: Assim, a classe super-rica (o 0,001%) consegue acumular ou concentrar riquezas (reais, tangíveis), em escala nunca antes vista. Além disso, pode moldar as novas regras do sistema (o «reset» é essencialmente isso), conservando o controlo das alavancas do poder monetário, financeiro e económico.     

----------------
(*)

PS1: Veja o gráfico abaixo, produzido pelo BIS, retirado do artigo de Zero Hedge, aqui: a taxa de crescimento da dívida em relação ao PIB, subiu vertiginosamente nos últimos tempos.





sexta-feira, 21 de junho de 2019

A GUERRA DE QUARENTA ANOS ENTRE OS EUA E O IRÃO


Infelizmente, as pessoas do Ocidente são mantidas num estado de ilusão, que se parece com a hipnose. São constantemente colocadas perante as narrativas dos grandes poderes, em particular dos meios oficiais dos EUA, para «justificação» de suas políticas. Porém, não apenas no aspecto da diplomacia, como no aspecto humanitário, elas são completamente indefensáveis.

                       

Para tal, basta ler o excelente artigo de David Stockman, que, melhor que eu, poderá esclarecer o que têm sido estes 40 anos de relações tempestuosas, entre as diversas administrações dos EUA e o governo dos Ayatollahs. 

O artigo é uma oportuna, rigorosa e detalhada argumentação, em como os EUA não estão a ser ameaçados pelo Irão, mas precisamente o contrário. 
O título em português seria: «A América em último lugar - qual o real significado da deplorável agressão de Trump contra o Irão»:


Peço desculpa por não o traduzir, mas este artigo é longo e, por outro lado, penso que vale a pena lê-lo no original. 

David Stockman 2011.jpg


Stockman é um antigo membro da equipa de Reagan. Ele é sobejamente conhecido e apreciado pela clareza e frontalidade do seu espírito crítico, que não poupa as políticas levadas a cabo nestes últimos anos, incluindo as da responsabilidade dos republicanos, «família política» à qual pertence, ou da qual é originário.