Mostrar mensagens com a etiqueta Golfo Pérsico. Mostrar todas as mensagens
Mostrar mensagens com a etiqueta Golfo Pérsico. Mostrar todas as mensagens

segunda-feira, 25 de maio de 2026

O PONTO DE VIRAGEM [CRÓNICA DA IIIª GUERRA MUNDIAL, Nº63]

 São "necessários" sacrifícios de inocentes numa escala tal, que abala a confiança do público nas instituições que governam em nome deles  e sobre eles. Exemplos? 

A repressão feroz e com o aval dum ministro israelita Ben Gvir, sobre a Flotilha pela Palestina. A atitude do público do «Ocidente», virou-se subitamente contra a barbárie sionista, a rotina da tortura, das humilhões, a indiferença em relação à Lei Internacional. No entanto, o comportamento tem sido esse em relação aos palestinianos, há anos, muitos anos. Um comportamento observável desde antes da proclamação do Estado de Israel. Só agora, a opinião pública dos países apoiantes de Israel ao nível governamental, manifesta o seu repúdio e considera Israel como o pior e mais odioso Estado ao nível mundial.

O ataque mortífero contra um dormitório dum colégio de formação de educadores, na região de Lugansk, utilizando drones britânicos, foi executado há dias, pelo exército da Ucrânia. Desde há um longo tempo, que os ucranianos e certos países europeus da OTAN e os EUA, se têm dedicado a ultrapassar as «linhas vermelhas», claramente sinalizadas por Moscovo. Estas provocações ucranianas com aval ocidental incluem atentados terroristas, ataques contra alvos civis - como refinarias, bairros residenciais, etc - assassinatos de generais ou tentativa de assassinato de Putin, etc. A atitude de Putin, tem sido de contenção, ciente de que a resposta a essas provocações poderia ser a «acendalha» que desencadearia uma guerra nuclear. Agora, a morte destes jovens num dormitório e indignação da população fez com que o Estado russo e as suas forças armadas, tivessem de tomar medidas punitivas - não meramente simbólicas - devastadoras para Kiev e para o regime que apoia Zelensky. 

O ataque brutal (enquanto decorriam negociações) dos EUA e Israel contra o Irão, causando a morte do seu líder Kamenei e muitos membros da alta hierarquia do Estado e forças armadas, assim como número muito elevado de civis e as destruições massiças de infraestruturas vitais, como pontes, escolas, centrais eléctricas, etc... Teve o efeito de galvanizar a população iraniana, mesmo os que - 2 meses antes - se manifestaram contra a carestia e foram brutalmente reprimidos pelo regime. A capacidade de resposta iraniana tem muito que ver com o moral da população, não apenas com os arsenais de mísseis e drones, cuidadosamente guardados ao abrigo de bombas inimigas. O resultado de ofensiva EUA-Israel foi fulgurante: Uma enorme derrota que ficará na História, como ponto de viragem do poderio bélico dos EUA e seu mais próximo aliado. 

Este ponto de viragem, tem como corolário uma mudança qualitativa na situação geopolítica mundial e, em particular, no Médio-Oriente.


Todas as guerras têm motivações económicas. Esta IIIª Guerra Mundial não é excepção, com as óbvias manobras para fazer fraquejar adversários, tomando controle de suas reservas de energia (caso venezuelano) ou levando a cabo uma guerra de destruição dos recursos (Irão e países do Golfo Pérsico). Isto traduz-se por uma internacionalização ou generalização, das dificuldades do abastecimento internacional em energia. Depois, muitos analistas prevêm que haverá escassez de alimentos, terríveis fomes causadas pela brusca subida dos preços de adubos sintéticos, do gasóleo e de muitos derivados do petróleo, correntemente usados nas mais diversas indústrias.

Perante a situação de crise múltipla - energética, alimentar, económica - os que detêm lugares de poder, agem como se esta generalização da guerra lhes trouxesse vantagens. Esta miopia tem precedentes históricos, mas os «nossos» dirigentes não sabem grande coisa de História, ou se sabem, agem de modo inconsequente. 

Os povos tidos como «civilizados» estão na vanguarda do retorno à barbárie, manobrados - sem dúvida - por forças racistas e de extrema-direita, mas que se apresentam como salvadoras, «populistas». 

As mesmas fórmulas de manipulação que serviram nas duas últimas Guerras Mundiais, nos países que se julgavam o centro do mundo, são agora  reutilizadas. As pessoas lúcidas têm muita dificuldade em estabelecer contacto direto com as massas, pois estas estão sob o efeito de uma hipnose coletiva, de um condicionamento massivo, que as impede de tomar plena consciência da realidade. 

domingo, 24 de maio de 2026

O CAOS DA VELHA ORDEM / RISCO DE ARRASTAR O MUNDO PARA DESTRUIÇÃO IRREPARÁVEL


 Um programa gravado em 23/05/2026 pelo jornal progressista on-line «Consortium News».

Convidados: Ray McGovern e Scott Ritter. Com apresentação de Joe Lauria. Produtora: Cathy Vogan.

sexta-feira, 24 de abril de 2026

David Stockman: A grande mentira sobre o Irão e a catástrofe no Golfo Pérsico

 [Copiado da página de Doug Casey: ]





By David Stockman

What is going on in the Persian Gulf is rotten beyond words.

The rogue madman in the Oval Office has detonated a conflagration there that could send the entire global economy and financial system spiraling into a catastrophe—and not just because or even mainly due to the 23 million barrels of oil per day at risk out of 105 million needed worldwide.

What’s really at risk is the underlying global financial system. The latter is a veritable house of cards sitting upon a mountain of debt, leverage, and speculative excess. So it may not have the capacity or resilience to withstand a sudden $200 per barrel oil shock.

Yet and yet. The whole insanely reckless act of launching a sweeping military attack on a nation of 90 million people that had zero capacity to impose military harm on the home territory of the United States is predicated on one of the Great Big Stinking Lies of History—namely, that the Iranian regime is a uniquely evil stain on the face of the earth and has spent 47 years bringing injury, mayhem, and death to America and much of the region around it.

The truth, however, is that there’s nothing especially unique about Iran’s manifold sins at all. It’s just another run-of-the-mill authoritarian state run by a medieval theocracy that has imposed one of the most benighted tyrannies of modern times. Accordingly, it has brought untold hardships and miseries to its people, especially via the brutal ruffians of the IRGC.

But that’s mainly the unfortunate work of the clerics and their IRGC allies ruling inside its borders. When it comes to the outside world, Iran has invaded not a single neighboring country since 1979, and indeed not in the last 300 years before the mullahs.

At the same time, Iran was savagely attacked by Saddam Hussein with U.S. and European arms during the 1980s; it has been brutally sanctioned by Washington trade embargoes and economic warfare for the past 30 years; and for decades, it has also been relentlessly assaulted via Israeli assassination squads, saboteurs, and periodic missiles and bombs.

In fact, the whole "leading state sponsor of terror" slogan has more validity as a Bibi Netanyahu campaign theme than it does as an accurate description of the real world.

And, no, the "whadabout the proxies" canard doesn’t cut it, either. Not a single one of Iran’s so-called "proxies" in the region was concocted out of whole cloth by the mullahs as some kind of mercenary force recruited, trained, and financed by Tehran and artificially implanted in the soil of Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, and Gaza.

To the contrary, the first three of these represented Shiite populations, which aligned with their Shiite brethren in Iran out of confessional ties and due to the fact that they were imperiled in their home countries. After all, there was no Hezbollah until Israel invaded southern Lebanon in the early 1980s and imposed a harsh occupation that left tens of thousands dead, culminating in the genocidal atrocities at Sabra and Shatila.

Likewise, the late Assad government in Syria was Alawite, which is a Shiite branch, and had been at war with Israel off and on since 1967 under Bashar Assad and his father before him. Whatever the merits of its half-century-long struggle with the Israelis, the Assad regime didn’t need any new marching orders from Tehran to become a "proxy."

Even in the case of Yemen, the country has been divided and wracked by civil war conditions since the 1960s as regionally based Shiite and Sunni factions battled for power.

The Houthis, domiciled in the north and west of Yemen, of course, are Shiite and made an alliance with Tehran. Not surprisingly, the southern and eastern Sunni areas of the country were aligned with the Sunni monarchy of Saudi Arabia, which has waged war against the Houthis much of the time since 2015.

Finally, however evil the Hamas forces surely are, they were not born, bred, and raised by the mullahs. If anything, the Israeli-sponsored open-air prison in Gaza and five brutal episodes of "mowing the lawn" via vicious bombing campaigns since 2007 were more than enough to explain the rise of Hamas.

In fact, Hamas was mainly Sunni, not Shiite, and was aligned with Iran only out of having a common enemy. Even then, most of the suitcases full of cash that Netanyahu permitted to come into Gaza year after year before October 7th were Sunni money from the Gulf states, not Iranian proxy finance.

 

So, yes, there has been a goodly amount of conflict and violence in the region, but it was not robotically commanded by the Ayatollahs. It was deeply rooted in the indigenous conflicts of the region that long pre-dated the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

The common thread, of course, is that all four of these forces were indigenous to the region and had a beef with Israel, separate and apart from anything happening in Tehran. That’s mainly because each of these groups was directly attacked or demonized by Bibi Netanyahu for deep reasons of Israeli politics.

For instance, the only reason Hamas thrived as long as it did is that Bibi Netanyahu financed it via Qatar in order to weaken the Palestinian Authority. In turn, that cynical ploy was aimed at scuttling any eventual implementation of the Oslo Accords and a two-state solution on the grounds that the Palestinians were so divided and violent that there was "no one to negotiate with."

In any event, the gist of the 47-Year War on America Lie stems almost entirely from Israel’s ongoing battle with the four mislabeled "proxies" and Washington’s repeated interventions, funding, and international political and diplomatic support for Israel. And even then, taking sides in this manner had no benefit whatsoever for the homeland security of America.

Yet it was the unnecessary and avoidable fallout from consistently taking sides with Israel against these regional foes that gave rise to the hoary myth that Iran has murdered more than 1,000 Americans over the 47 years since the Revolution. Yet a simple fact check conducted by Grok 4 at our request debunks this endlessly chanted claim lock, stock, and barrel.

Here are the key realities:

  • Not one of the 1,050 American deaths during this period occurred on American soil.
  • Exactly 1,041 of these deaths occurred at the hands of alleged Iranian proxies versus only 9 attributable to the Iranian military or other government agencies.
  • Fully 1,000 or 96% of the American deaths happened in the context of U.S. military deployments to the region and the resulting active wars and peacekeeping activities in Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, and adjacent territories and coastal waters.

That’s right. Not one of these U.S. military deployments from the Beirut Marine barracks forward was necessary for America’s homeland security. To the contrary, all were elective wars undertaken in pursuit of the imperatives of Empire.

Accordingly, the resulting deaths are due to putting American military and civilian personnel wrongfully in harm’s way—and most especially from taking sides in local and regional military conflicts that were none of Washington’s business.

In short, the 1,000 American deaths chant is completely and hideously wrong because these figures resulted from Washington-initiated military actions in the Mideast that were wholly unjustified and, consequently, put American lives in harm’s way against local people who had reason to defend themselves from actual or potential U.S. military assault.

Thus, while all of these deaths were tragic and unnecessary, the neocon exploitation and lies about them need to be subject to withering ridicule. That is to say, things that didn’t need to happen owing to Washington’s fault over nearly a half-century do not remotely amount to a casus belli in any rational world.

Indeed, even if you consider these unfortunate deaths as abstract statistics without context or blame, there is absolutely no cause to start a quasi-world war in the Persian Gulf, which supplies a crucial share of the world’s crude oil, refined petroleum, LPGs, liquefied natural gas, industrial sulfur, and helium crucial to semiconductor chip production, among others.

To the contrary, the unhinged madman domiciled in the all-powerful Oval Office has the region, the U.S., and the global economy on the edge of catastrophic upheaval based on an utterly untruthful narrative about 1,050 American deaths during the last 47 years that were far exceeded by the ordinary course accidents and hazards of daily life in America during that same period, such as fatalities from:

  • Powered lawnmower accidents: 3,200 deaths.
  • Bee stings: 3,900 deaths.
  • Falling out of bed: 10,300 deaths.
  • Visiting Mexico: 4,000 Americans murdered there.
  • Lightning strikes: 2,000 deaths.
  • Cardiac arrest during sex: 8,000 deaths.


quinta-feira, 2 de abril de 2026

Resumo crítico da atuação de Trump


A derrocada do poderio imperial pode medir-se de várias maneiras. Mas, uma que me parece ter grande poder de diagnóstico, é a credibilidade do seu líder máximo. Com efeito, nada afeta mais a credibilidade de um líder, do que as reviravoltas, as declarações solenes, a política (não apenas externa, note-se) em direcção contrária às promessas eleitorais. Aqueles que, crédulos, votaram nele, sentem-se defraudados. Sondagens recentes mostram que - mesmo nas hostes «MAGA» - não existe apoio maioritário a Trump. Este conjunto de comportamentos mostra ao mundo uma imagem de incoerência, hesitação, falta de palavra... tudo coisas incompatíveis com a confiança necessária para haver relações diplomáticas normais, e relações comerciais baseadas em vantagens mútuas. 
Não tenho dúvida que, quer nas relações pessoais, quer nas relações de Estado para Estado, não existe estabilidade, quando não se confia que o outro lado se comprometa e respeite a palavra dada. A instabilidade reina. Mas isto é letal para o sistema capitalista, ou para qualquer outro. A consequência, é a impossibilidade de se fazer acordos, de se encetar negócios, de se fazer andar a economia.
Vamos direitos a uma depressão mundial, pois a recessão já está aqui, apesar da media servil aos poderes nos querer convencer do contrário.