Barbara Stiegler: Crise do COVID gerida em função dos interesses da oligarquia

 

OS ALVORES DUM NOVO REICH???

Transcrevo parte de uma carta de CJ Hopkins. Um caso que pode parecer absurdo, mas que é - pelo contrário - muito real, pois as autoridades policiais e judiciais alemãs sabem perfeitamente o que dizem as leis e a constituição da própria Alemanha, sobre a liberdade de opinião e o direito de expressão do pensamento e opiniões, oralmente ou por escrito. Também as autoridades respectivas do IIIº Reich sabiam aquilo que estava consignado na constituição da República de Weimar, mas «estavam-se nas tintas».

[....]

 A Swiss organization defending freedom of speech in Switzerland and Germany, Bündnis Redefreiheit (Free Speech Union) has taken on my case, and they published a rather good introduction to it and the issues in question.

The German version is on their website. The English version is below.

Before you read it, I want to say a few words about “book burning,” which the folks at Bündnis Redefreiheit mean metaphorically, of course. The German authorities are not literally burning books or organizing public book-burning rituals like the Nazis.

However, I am being criminally investigated for publishing and promoting a book. The police raided my home looking for evidence that I am the publisher of a book. That is the “crime” that is cited as grounds for this second investigation.

Please, reflect on that for a minute.

The book in question has been banned in Germany since the summer of 2022. As far as I know, the German authorities still deny that it is banned, but it is. It was pulled from distribution by German booksellers (presumably by Libri and the other major German book distributors) at the same time that it was officially banned in Germany by Amazon and the previous criminal investigation of me was launched. And now I’m being criminally investigated for the second time, and having my home raided and searched by the police, for the “crime” of publishing, distributing, and promoting it.

A book.

Obviously, at this point, it is clear that the German authorities have absolutely zero respect for the law, or the rule of law, or the Grundgesetz (i.e., basically the German constitution), or basic democratic rights and principles like freedom of speech. The fact that a German judge actually signed a search warrant authorizing the police to raid my home because I wrote and published a book, well, I don’t know what to say exactly, other than … welcome to the New Normal Reich!

I’ll have more to say about it as time goes by, and after the German authorities send my attorney the new case file, and after I recover and regain my strength a bit. I am extremely worn out at the moment. I just did an exhausting two-month road trip all over the USA. And of course I caught a nasty winter bug upon my return. And, well, honestly, I’m utterly burnt-out from the last five years of opposing this new form of totalitarianism that is taking hold, not just here in Germany, but all throughout the West. I’ll dig into all that once again after I get my sea legs back.

For now, here’s the overview of my case(s) by Bündnis Redefreiheit.

---

The C. J. Hopkins Case: Modern Book Burning

Bündnis Redefreiheit

On the morning of Wednesday, 26 November 2025, three armed police officers arrived at the Berlin apartment of American writer C. J. Hopkins with a search warrant issued by the Amtsgericht Tiergarten. As he reports on his Substack, the officers not only searched the apartment but also confiscated his computer and interrogated his wife.

Hopkins is an award-winning playwright, novelist, and political satirist. In 2022, he published The Rise of the New Normal Reich: Consent Factory Essays, Vol. III (2020–2021), a book that delivers a sustained and sharply argued critique of the authoritarian tendencies that emerged during the Covid era. It was this book that brought the police to his door that morning.

The cover of the book makes Hopkins’ point immediately visible. Drawing on the familiar design of William L. Shirer’s history book The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, which features a large swastika, Hopkins’ version shows the same symbol partly obscured by a Covid mask. It is a direct visual statement: in Hopkins’ view, the coercive measures of the Covid period bore an uncomfortable resemblance to an earlier authoritarian system that also invoked emergency measures to override basic rights. The image is unmistakably political commentary of the anti-authoritarian kind.

But the Berlin state prosecutor sees it differently. According to the warrant for the house search, the cover allegedly violates §86a of the German Criminal Code, the law that forbids the use of unconstitutional symbols when used in a supportive way. Hopkins is accused of publishing, selling, and displaying his book, and of showing the cover on his website. In other words, the prosecutor is treating an anti-authoritarian book as a criminal act.

The police search was authorized to determine whether Hopkins published, distributes, and promotes his book, and whether he is the owner and operator of his blog, consentfactory.org, where the book is advertised. But these questions are not mysteries. The answers are public knowledge. Hopkins is the author. His website bears his name, his photo, and his biography. His books are advertised and sold by booksellers worldwide. There is nothing hidden here.

A house search, however, is one of the most invasive measures the state can take. It must be proportionate and requires a clear need to uncover evidence that cannot be obtained in any other way. That bar was not met. There was no serious question that required armed officers to enter the home of an author. The search served no legitimate investigative purpose. It served a symbolic one. It sent a message: we can come into your home and harass you for what you write.

This alone should concern anyone who values free expression. But the core issue runs deeper. Hopkins’ book does not promote fascism. It warns against it. It uses the symbol of the swastika not to support Nazi ideology, but to condemn modern political trends that he believes resemble it. The entire point of the book is to say: “Be careful. This looks familiar.” And the phrase “The New Normal Reich” carries just a trace of satire, enough to signal discomfort and alert the grey cells that danger is afoot.

In any healthy democracy, such a warning falls squarely under protected political speech. It is the kind of analogy that writers, historians, and political thinkers have always made. One may find it exaggerated, uncomfortable, or even unfair, but that is not the same as illegal. Satire is not propaganda. Criticism is not endorsement. A warning is not a celebration.

By treating a critical image as criminal use of Nazi symbols, the state prosecutor collapses distinctions that are essential to free debate. It is a category error with serious consequences. If this interpretation of the state prosecutor stands, then any critical representation of a Nazi symbol, whether in a documentary, a satirical cartoon, a historical comparison, or a work of fiction, could be targeted in exactly the same way.

The result is predictable: people stop speaking. Writers avoid certain topics. Artists censor themselves. Publishers become nervous. And so, the range of permitted thought narrows. This is how censorship works today: through the banning of books, and the steady pressure of enforced legal threats backed by bureaucratic intimidation.

The fact that this search occurred at all is evidence of such pressure. A police raid is frightening, disruptive, and humiliating. It disturbs daily life. It seizes tools required for work. It intrudes into private space. And it does all this without any real necessity. The message is unmistakable: writing and publishing this book will cost you.

As Hopkins’ lawyer has rightly argued, the raid was not merely a procedural excess but an assault on several of the most basic guarantees of a democratic society: freedom of opinion, freedom of the press, artistic freedom, and the inviolability of the home. These principles are not decorative features of a constitution; they are the very bedrock by which a people keep power from coagulating into something unaccountable and oppressive. That the German authorities are acting arbitrarily here is beyond question, since Der Spiegel and Stern have already employed the swastika critically on their respective magazine’s covers, without police searching their offices.

It takes only a moment’s honest reading to see that Hopkins cannot, by any stretch available to common sense or literary judgment, be aligned with fascism or Nazism, for his entire argument depends on the premise that the Covid era represented, in miniature and in embryo, a repetition of the authoritarian temptations that disfigured the twentieth century. A man does not praise what he holds up as a warning sign; he does not revere the very phenomenon he uses as the yardstick of political decay.

Hopkins invokes the Third Reich not as a beacon but as a boundary, the outer edge of what a society must never again permit itself to become. And in doing so he places Nazism in the same conceptual space one reserves for toxic substances, useful only as a reference point for recognizing when the air has gone foul. To accuse him of sympathy with fascism is to miss the entire structure of his criticism, to mistake the smoke alarm for the fire. Hopkins is not flirting with Nazism; he is arguing that its ghost walks more easily in modern halls than we care to admit, and he is pleading for the vigilance necessary to keep that ghost from taking on flesh once more.

Germany no longer burns books in the literal sense. Instead, it restricts their distribution. It removes them from platforms. It harasses their authors. It treats political criticism as criminal offenses. The flames are gone, but the censorial principle survives. Indeed, you can no longer buy Hopkins’ book in German book stores, nor on Amazon in Germany, Austria, and the Netherlands.

One does not have to agree with C. J. Hopkins to recognize what is at stake. Today, it is a satirical book cover. Tomorrow, it could be Shirer’s history book about the Third Reich (which is still freely available in Germany). The next day, a political cartoon. Once the state begins treating dissent as danger, and criticism as extremism, the slope quickly becomes very slippery and steep.

In this case, the German authorities have done something abominable in a state that still considers itself liberal and democratic. They have taken a critic of authoritarianism and responded to his critique with authoritarian methods. And that is precisely the problem Hopkins has been writing about all along.

C. J. Hopkins wrote about the house search on his Substack: https://cjhopkins.substack.com/p/a-visit-by-the-german-thought-police

Hopkins’ lawyer gave Junge Freiheit an interview about the house search and the charges filed: https://jungefreiheit.de/debatte/interview/2025/sonst-haetten-auch-spiegel-oder-stern-bestraft-werden-muessen/

A note on an earlier, pending case

Hopkins’ has had dealings with the German state before. That first trouble began with two tweets he posted in August 2022, each accompanied by the same image of his book now at the center of this newest case: a medical mask over a still visible swastika. One tweet quoted Germany’s then health minister saying that masks “always send a signal,” and the other described masks as symbols of ideological conformity. The meaning was obvious: Hopkins was criticizing coercive government measures, not supporting Nazism.

But the Berlin prosecutor treated the image as “dissemination of Nazi symbols,” ignoring the context entirely and pursuing him as if he were a propagandist rather than a satirist. What should have been recognized instantly as a political warning was instead hauled into court as a criminal offense. This case of Hopkins’ tweets is currently pending in Germany’s constitutional court.

POST SCRIPTUM:

A raiva persecutória estende-se a Elon Musk e a «X» com uma  avultada multa, dentro do mesmo espírito de reprimir, desencentivar, intimidar, para que as críticas sejam silenciadas. Porém, esta indiferença pelos valores (supostamente) defendidos nas democracias liberais, só mostra que - afinal - a adesão a tais princípios e valores é uma fachada, para os poderes. Apenas tolerados, na medida em que não incomodem. 

Hoje CJ Hopkins, Elon Musk e muitos outros de que nem ouvimos falar, amanhã a mordaça para todos os que não estão ao diapasão do Novo Reich e da Comissão de Bruxelas, com a Führerin Úrsula... Eis, de novo, os fantasmas que se introduzem nas nações europeias, sem terem sido convidados. A cidadania tem de acordar e reagir. Isto já foi longe demais.

RELACIONADO:

 MANIPULAÇÃO DAS MASSAS

ALEMANHA É OFICIALMENTE UM ESTADO DE VIGILÂNCIA GENERALIZADO

COMO A MÉDIA MAINSTREAM SE CONVERTEU EM PROPAGANDA DOS ESTADOS

 

Patrik Baab: A Propaganda de Guerra Destruíu a Média & a Liberdade de Pensamento...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1l4c5fWn8M

Um artigo circunstanciado, em como as «elites» ocidentais e o jornalismo mainstream apagaram das notícias as referências à ideologia nazi e aos atos criminosos contra os russo-falantes ucranianos, após o golpe de Maidan em 2014:

«Ucrânia : as provas apagadas» por Manlio Dinucci

PS1: Na minha opinião, a crise do COVID foi pretexto para alcançar um novo patamar de censura e discriminação contra tudo o que não se conformasse com a ditadura globalista.

 Veja: https://manuelbaneteleproprio.blogspot.com/2020/09/humanismo-contra-barbarie.html

PS2: 

Documentário Censurado Expõe Como o Governo dos EUA Difunde Propaganda Como Sendo «Jornalismo Independente», por The Dissident

Um em cada oito estudantes nos EUA incapaz de compreensão de matemática elementar

          Foto: Educação «on-line»

Retirado e traduzido a partir de Armstrong Economics

A Universidade UC San Diego divulgou um estudo preocupante que mostrava que 1 em cada 8 alunos candidatos ao curso da faculdade (college) tem uma competência de apenas escola média em matemática. A instituição viu-se forçada a introduzir cursos de recuperação em matemática para os alunos dos primeiros anos da faculdade, que colmatassem as carências que vinham desde a escola elementar, até ao liceu. O denominador comum tem sido o COVID, pois as notas caíram rapidamente desde 2020.

O número de estudantes que precisavam de aulas de recuperação em matemática amplificou-se de 1 em 100, para 1 em 8.  Os estudantes têm dificuldade em resolver equações básicas. “Preencha o valor de X correspondente: 7 + 2 = X + 6.” Uma assustadora percentagem de 25%  de estudantes não conseguia responder a esta pergunta. Cerca de 37% dos estudantes eram incapazes de subtraír fracções e 61% tinham dificuldade em fazer um arredondamento com números elevados, até à centena mais próxima. A UCSD está classificada atualmente como a 5ª melhor universidade pública americana e tem 24% de aceitação. A situação na generalidade dos estudantes americanos é muito pior. 

O estudo não atribuia o problema à política de «Nenhuma Criança Fica Para Trás» implementada pelo ex-presidente George W. Bush em 2001. O estudo da UCSD atribui o declínio acentuado a factores mais recentes, como a paragem educativa devida ao COVID-19, a eliminação de testes estandardizados nas admissões, a inflação das notas e o crescente recrutamento a partir de liceus sub-financiados.

Estes estudantes estavam nos 8º ou 9º anos quando os «lockdowns» fizeram a educação parar. O que acontecerá aos estudantes mais jovens que viveram interrupções quando estes conceitos básicos foram indroduzidos pela primeira vez no curriculum?

O Programa para Avaliação Internacional dos Estudantes (PISA) é efetuado cada três anos, para avaliar a educação entre as nações da OCDE. O teste é dado a cerca de 600 mil estudantes de 15 e 16 anos, nos vários países, para avaliar o seu nível de compreensão de matemática, ciências e leitura. Em relação a 2022, estas são as dez nações com melhores resultados em matemática: Singapura (575), China (552), Taiwan (547), Hong Kong (540), Japão (536), Coreia do Sul (527), Estónia (510), Suíça (508), Canadá (497), Países Baixos (493). Os estudantes dos EUA têm um score de 465, ficando 90 pontos abaixo da China.

Os lockdowns do COVID apenas exacerbaram a crise educacional nos EUA; a próxima geração de trabalhadores estará numa desvantagem extrema.

DESDE 2020 que é sabido: 86% DOS TESTES PCR «POSITIVOS» não eram infecções reais.

 Transcrevo na íntegra o artigo de Nicholas Hulscher e do Prof. Michel Chossudovsky. Convido os meus leitores a ler o seu conteúdo e a divulgarem ao máximo, como forma de «higiene e profilaxia» contra a perpetuação duma narrativa enganadora sobre a crise do COVID. 

Como os meus leitores habituais sabem, eu acompanhei a crise do COVID, desde os seus primeiros momentos. Sou biólogo de formação, especializado em genética molecular e microbiologia. Vi desde logo, com muito espanto, as distorções e fabricações que se espalharam como fogo na media corporativa. Vi também, ainda mais preocupado, uma parte maioritária das profissões médicas ou de saúde e de académicos, aceitar a narrativa oficial, inflacionando os casos de infeção por COVID, porque isso reforçava o poder absoluto de farmacêuticas gigantes (nomeadamente Pfizer, Zeneca, Moderna...), sobre os Estados e a própria OMS.

Eu fiquei «vacinado» em relação à «bondade» dos Estados e seus agentes, às instituições destinadas a «cuidar da saúde da população» e à globalidade da média «mainstream», que orquestrou a maior campanha terrorista de desinformação ao nível mundial. 

Eu sabia, desde 2020, da enorme fraude do chamado teste «PCR» para detetar o vírus do COVID, mas apesar dos meus esforços de esclarecimento, não consegui convencer da realidade pessoas chegadas, incluindo familiares. A grande maioria preferiu «ignorar» os meus argumentos, apesar de eu ter uma abordagem pedagógica dos assuntos.

O mal que nos fizeram, a todos nós, ainda está a decorrer. Isto é possível, porque as pessoas comuns não conseguem crer na corrupção dos políticos no poder, das organizações internacionais e das grandes empresas de «saúde». Quanto aos media, estes em vez de nos informar honestamente, «inoculam» a opinião pública com falsas notícias, ao mesmo tempo que difamam os cientistas corajosos que se ergueram contra a desinformação.

Oxalá que artigos como este, transcrito abaixo, saltem a barreira da censura da média corporativa e sejam lidos atentamente por pessoas honestas, para que elas compreendam como têm sido enganadas.

 

BREAKING: Peer Reviewed Report. 86% of PCR-Positive “COVID Cases” Were Not Real Infections

By Nicolas Hulscher and Prof Michel Chossudovsky

Michel Chossudovsky

Nov 11, 2025

[This article was originally published by Focal Points and reposted on Global Research. You can read it here.]

We bring go the attention of our readers, the pointed analysis of Dr. Nicolas Hulscher pertaining to a peer-reviewed study conducted in Germany which has “dismantled the scientific foundation used to justify lockdowns, social distancing, and vaccine mandates.

[Click here to access the peer-reviewed study.]

Déjà Vu: Introductory Note by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky

Ironically, this was known right from the beginning of the COVID crisis in early 2020.

And now we are informed by a so-called bombshell peer-reviewed study of something which was firmly established at the outset of the COVID crisis in January 2020.

“The PCR is a process. It does not tell you that you are sick.” –Dr. Kary Mullis, Nobel Laureate and Inventor of the RT-PCR, passed away in August 2019.

“…All or a substantial part of these positives could be due to what’s called false positives tests.” –Dr. Michael Yeadon, distinguished scientist, former Vice President and Chief Science Officer of Pfizer

“This misuse of the RT-PCR technique is applied as a relentless and intentional strategy by some governments to justify excessive measures such as the violation of a large number of constitutional rights, … under the pretext of a pandemic based on a number of positive RT-PCR tests, and not on a real number of patients.” –Dr. Pascal Sacré, Belgian physician specialized in critical care and renowned public health analyst.

“The PCR “test” cannot detect the identity of the virus, nor can it detect its variants and sub-variants.” —Dr. Kary Mullis. His legacy will prevail.

[Click here to watch the video.]

The slanted methodology applied under WHO guidance for detecting the alleged spread of the virus is the Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) test, which has been routinely applied all over the world since February 2020.

The RT-PCR test has been used worldwide to generate millions of erroneous “COVID-19 confirmed cases”, which are then used to sustain the illusion that the alleged pandemic is real.

This assessment based on erroneous numbers has been used in the course of the last [five] years to spearhead and sustain the fear campaign.

And people are now led to believe that the COVID-19 “vaccine” is the “solution”. And that “normality” will be restored once the entire population of planet Earth has been vaccinated.

“Confirmed” is a misnomer. A “confirmed RT-PCR positive case” does not imply a “COVID-19 confirmed case”.

“Positive RT-PCR is not synonymous with the COVID-19 disease! PCR specialists make it clear that a test must always be compared with the clinical record of the patient being tested, with the patient’s state of health to confirm its value [reliability].” —(Dr. Pascal Sacré)

The procedure used by the national health authorities is to categorize all RT-PCR positive cases as “COVID-19 confirmed cases” (with or without a medical diagnosis). Ironically, this routine process of identifying “confirmed cases” is in derogation of the CDC’s own guidelines:

“Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms. The performance of this test has not been established for monitoring treatment of 2019-nCoV infection. This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.” (Emphasis added)

The methodology used to detect and estimate the spread of the virus is flawed and invalid.

False Positives

The earlier debate at the outset of the crisis focused on the issue of “false positives.” Acknowledged by the WHO and the CDC, the RT-PCR test was known to produce a high percentage of false positives. According to Dr. Pascal Sacré:

“Today, as authorities test more people, there are bound to be more positive RT-PCR tests. This does not mean that COVID-19 is coming back, or that the epidemic is moving in waves. There are more people being tested, that’s all.”

The debate on false positives (acknowledged by health authorities) points to so-called errors without necessarily questioning the overall validity of the RT-PCR test as a means to detecting the alleged spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

The PCR Test Does Not Detect the Identity of the Virus

The RT-PCR test does not identify/detect the virus. What the PCR test identifies are genetic fragments of numerous viruses (including influenza viruses types A and B and coronaviruses which trigger common colds).

The results of the RT-PCR test cannot “confirm” whether an individual who undertakes the test is infected with SARS-CoV-2.

All that is required is the presence of “viral genetic material” for it to be categorized as “positive”. The procedure does not identify or isolate SARS-COV-2. What appears in the tests are fragments of the virus.

Selected excerpts from Chapter III of Michel Chossudovsky‘s Book entitled:

The Worldwide Corona Crisis, Global Coup d’Etat Against Humanity

---

Peer Reviewed Report: 86% of PCR-Positive “COVID Cases” Were Not Real Infections

by Dr. Nicolas Hulscher

A bombshell peer-reviewed study out of Germany just dismantled the scientific foundation used to justify lockdowns, social distancing, and vaccine mandates.

Researchers analyzed data from the Akkreditierte Labore in der Medizin (ALM) — a nationwide consortium of authority-accredited medical laboratories that performed roughly 90% of all SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests in Germany between 2020 and 2023.

When researchers compared the ALM’s week-by-week PCR positivity rates with the same labs’ IgG antibody testing data — essentially measuring who truly developed infection-induced immunity — they discovered something staggering:

Only about 14% of those who tested PCR-positive during the early pandemic period (2020–mid-2021) actually developed antibodies — meaning most early “cases” were never real infections.

Even under the most conservative assumptions — correcting for possible overrepresentation of IgG-positive individuals in the sample — the true infection fraction fell to roughly 10%, implying that nearly 90% of PCR positives were false or non-infectious detections, often just residual RNA fragments amplified at CT thresholds of 35–45.

What This Means

• Mass PCR testing grossly inflated case numbers worldwide. Every nation that used similar CT thresholds likely overcounted “infections” by an order of magnitude.

• Lockdowns and mandates were built on a false metric. The German “7-day incidence” used to trigger restrictions was statistically meaningless — and identical logic applied in the U.S., U.K., and elsewhere. In America, the entire “15 Days to Slow the Spread” campaign was predicated on the same inflated PCR scam.

• Authorities suppressed representative serology data. Germany’s RKI and Ministry of Health had access to these ALM antibody results but never disclosed them — despite their policy relevance.

• Rewriting pandemic history. If only 10–14% of reported PCR “cases” during the first year reflected true infections, then the infection-fatality rate, transmission models, and emergency declarations were all built on sand. By the end of 2020—months before vaccination began—roughly one-quarter of Germany’s population already carried natural antibodies. In other words, while authorities were declaring an uncontrolled crisis, herd-level immunity was already taking shape. By late 2021, nearly the entire population was IgG-positive. The evidence shows that pandemic policy was driven not by infection reality, but by a diagnostic illusion.

PCR technology and testing thresholds were standardized across WHO member states.

That means the same distortion likely occurred everywhere — a systemic diagnostic inflation that may be the single greatest fraud in public health history.

These tactics were likely used to amplify fear in order to boost compliance with lockdowns and experimental gene-based “vaccines.” This was demonstrated by Gao et al, who found that public fear of COVID-19 (PFC) was positively associated with the number of COVID-19 vaccinations at county-level: “as PFC increases from 0 to 300, the predicted vaccination number increases from 10,000 to 230,000.”

This is in line with fraudulent attempts to artificially increase COVID-19 death counts. Basoulis et al found that 45.3% of “COVID-19 deaths” in Greece were not actually due to COVID-19:

In the end, most of the population did encounter the manufactured virus and develop antibodies—but the PCR data that justified global lockdowns, fear, and vaccine mandates were a complete fraud. Accountability is warranted.

***

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation

---

The Worldwide Corona Crisis, Global Coup d’Etat Against Humanity

by Michel Chossudovsky

Michel Chossudovsky reviews in detail how this insidious project “destroys people’s lives”. He provides a comprehensive analysis of everything you need to know about the “pandemic” — from the medical dimensions to the economic and social repercussions, political underpinnings, and mental and psychological impacts.

“My objective as an author is to inform people worldwide and refute the official narrative which has been used as a justification to destabilize the economic and social fabric of entire countries, followed by the imposition of the “deadly” COVID-19 “vaccine”. This crisis affects humanity in its entirety: almost 8 billion people. We stand in solidarity with our fellow human beings and our children worldwide. Truth is a powerful instrument.”

Reviews

This is an in-depth resource of great interest if it is the wider perspective you are motivated to understand a little better, the author is very knowledgeable about geopolitics and this comes out in the way Covid is contextualized. —Dr. Mike Yeadon

In this war against humanity in which we find ourselves, in this singular, irregular and massive assault against liberty and the goodness of people, Chossudovsky’s book is a rock upon which to sustain our fight. –Dr. Emanuel Garcia

In fifteen concise science-based chapters, Michel traces the false covid pandemic, explaining how a PCR test, producing up to 97% proven false positives, combined with a relentless 24/7 fear campaign, was able to create a worldwide panic-laden “plandemic”; that this plandemic would never have been possible without the infamous DNA-modifying Polymerase Chain Reaction test – which to this day is being pushed on a majority of innocent people who have no clue. His conclusions are evidenced by renown scientists. —Peter Koenig

Professor Chossudovsky exposes the truth that “there is no causal relationship between the virus and economic variables.” In other words, it was not COVID-19 but, rather, the deliberate implementation of the illogical, scientifically baseless lockdowns that caused the shutdown of the global economy. –David Skripac

A reading of Chossudovsky’s book provides a comprehensive lesson in how there is a global coup d’état under way called “The Great Reset” that if not resisted and defeated by freedom loving people everywhere will result in a dystopian future not yet imagined. Pass on this free gift from Professor Chossudovsky before it’s too late. You will not find so much valuable information and analysis in one place. –Edward Curtin

ISBN: 978-0-9879389-3-0, Year: 2022, PDF Ebook, Pages: 164, 15 Chapters

Price: $11.50 FREE COPY! Click here (docsend) and download.

You may also access the online version of the e-Book by clicking here.

We encourage you to support the eBook project by making a donation through Global Research’s DonorBox “Worldwide Corona Crisis” Campaign Page.

---

Subscribe to Michel Chossudovsky