VOLUNTÁRIO ESPANHOL EXPRIME-SE SOBRE A GUERRA DA UCRÂNIA

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4UHsBcYB-Gs

Simon tem combatido na frente do Donbass do lado russo. O seu testemunho e ponto de vista têm a autenticidade de alguém que une as palavras aos atos.

PEPE ESCOBAR FOI AO DONBASS E CONTA-NOS O QUE VIU

 

«Como vai ser» pelo Major-General Raúl Cunha

 [copiado de  https://estatuadesal.com/2023/07/27/como-vai-ser/]

Como vai ser

Major-General Raúl Cunha, in Facebook, 26/07/2023) «Penso que já deve ser óbvio para toda a gente que a guerra na Ucrânia constitui uma verdadeira catástrofe que provavelmente não irá terminar tão cedo e, quando terminar, o resultado final não vai ser uma paz duradoura. Vejamos então como foi que o Ocidente acabou por se encontrar nesta terrível situação. A argumentação tradicional da maioria dos dirigentes e “sabichões” ocidentais sobre as origens da guerra é que Putin lançou um ataque não provocado em 24 de Fevereiro de 2022, motivado pelo seu grande plano de criar uma Rússia ainda maior. A Ucrânia, assim o pintam, era o primeiro país que ele pretendia conquistar e anexar, mas não seria o último. Mas, em alternativa a esse delírio visionário e como já muitos e bons repetiram em várias ocasiões, não há quaisquer evidências a sustentar essa linha de alegações e, pelo contrário, há provas consideráveis que directamente a contradizem. A realidade foi que, em 2021, ucranianos e americanos já tinham decidido tentar a recaptura da Crimeia pela força (o que projectaram para o final do inverno seguinte) e para esse efeito começaram a concentrar as tropas ucranianas na frente do Donbass, procederam ao fornecimento maciço de armamento e ao treino de combate acelerado dos regimentos ‘Azov’ e do exército. Entre 16 e 23 de Fevereiro e obviamente no âmbito de uma grande operação militar em perspectiva, foram intensificados de forma exponencial os bombardeamentos sobre Donetsk e Lugansk. O objectivo da operação (à semelhança do que foi feito na operação "Tempestade" na Croácia em 1995) seria rapidamente tomar o controlo de todo o território ucraniano na posse dos separatistas, sem que os russos tivessem tempo de reagir. Em face desta possibilidade, a reação russa teve de ser planeada e executada à pressa – decidiram surpreender os ucranianos tomando a iniciativa de serem os primeiros a atacar e em cerca de dez dias reconheceram a independência das repúblicas separatistas e estabeleceram com as mesmas os legítimos acordos de cooperação e operação militar à luz do direito internacional. Embora não haja dúvidas de que, na prática, a Rússia invadiu a Ucrânia, a causa final e principal desta guerra foi de facto a decisão do Ocidente – e neste caso referimo-nos principalmente aos Estados Unidos – de fazer da Ucrânia um baluarte ocidental na fronteira da Rússia. O elemento fundamental dessa estratégia era a entrada da Ucrânia para a NATO, um acontecimento que Putin e os seus acólitos, e os deputados de todos os partidos do espectro político russo, viam unanimemente como sendo uma ameaça existencial que teria de ser eliminada. Esquecemo-nos frequentemente que um grande número dos que conceberam as políticas e de estrategas, americanos e europeus, se opuseram à expansão da NATO desde o início, porque entendiam que os russos a veriam como uma ameaça e que essa política acabaria levando ao desastre. A lista dos que se opuseram inclui George Kennan, o Secretário da Defesa do Presidente Clinton, William Perry e o seu Chefe do Estado-Maior Conjunto, general John Shalikashvili, Paul Nitze, Robert Gates, Robert McNamara, Richard Pipes e Jack Matlock, apenas para citar alguns. Na cimeira da NATO em Bucareste, em Abril de 2008, quer o Presidente francês Nicolas Sarkozy quer a Chanceler alemã Angela Merkel se opuseram ao plano do Presidente George W. Bush de trazer a Ucrânia para a Aliança. Merkel disse mais tarde que a sua oposição se baseou na sua crença de que Putin interpretaria esse facto como uma “declaração de guerra”. É agora claro que aqueles que se opunham à expansão da NATO estavam correctos, mas infelizmente perderam esse debate e a NATO avançou para o leste, o que acabou por levar os russos a desencadearem esta guerra. Se os Estados Unidos e os seus aliados não tivessem actuado de forma a procurarem trazer a Ucrânia para a OTAN em Abril de 2008, ou se tivessem estado dispostos a acomodar as preocupações de segurança de Moscovo, depois de ter rebentado a crise na Ucrânia em Fevereiro de 2014, provavelmente não teria acontecido a actual guerra na Ucrânia e as fronteiras desta estariam ainda como eram, quando do seu acesso à independência em 1991. O Ocidente cometeu um erro colossal, pelo qual todos nós e muitos outros mais, ainda iremos pagar severamente.  » Comentário de MB: O Ocidente no seu conjunto cometeu um erro colossal, sim... Mas, o tal erro foi instigado, perseguido e executado tenazmente por uma pequena minoria entrincheirada no aparelho de Estado dos EUA - designada por Neocons - os quais consideram que a guerra contra a Rússia atual é um mero prolongamento da Guerra-Fria, em que se enfrentaram a URSS e o Ocidente. Os políticos e altos cargos militares do establishment foram arrastados pelos Neocons. Estes, podem considerar-se verdadeiros conspiradores do interior da máquina de poder de Washington. A fraqueza ou hesitação dos dirigentes menos belicosos, face aos Neocons é responsável pelo facto do Ocidente ter sido arrastado a fazer que eles (Neocons) queriam: Orquestrar uma guerra com a Rússia, em que esta apareça como a «agressora».

DESTRUIÇÃO DE FÁBRICA HIDROELÉTRICA DE KAKHOVKA

Notícia do Magazine Sputnik:

«Na noite de 5 para 6 de junho, bombardeamentos ucranianos destruíram a parte superior da hidroelétrica de Kakhovka, na região de Kherson, o que desencadeou um fluxo descontrolado de água, inundando áreas próximas.»

«Começou a evacuação dos moradores civis das áreas inundadas. Enquanto isso, o governador interino da região de Kherson, Vladimir Saldo, informou que a evacuação em massa não será necessária e o aumento do nível do rio Dniepre não impede as ações militares russas.

As reparações da usina hidrelétrica de Kakhovka não são possíveis e a instalação terá que ser reconstruída, conforme o chefe do distrito municipal de Novaya Kakhovka, Vladimir Leontiev.»

------------------------------

Comentário de MB:

A media ocidental tem apresentado esta catástrofe como obra dos próprios russos. Desde o primeiro momento que esta visão de auto-sabotagem é totalmente injustificada porque:

- Os russos estão interessados em manter o controlo sobre esta barragem

- Esta barragem é fundamental para fornecer água ao grande canal que abastece a Crimeia do Norte.

- A destruição da barragem serve os objetivos de Kiev: A área inundada situa-se maioritariamente na margem esquerda do Dniepr, sob controlo russo. Um avanço para Oeste das forças armadas russas, em resultado da falhada ofensiva ucraniana, é agora mais difícil.

- Também satisfaz os objetivos de Kiev e dos países da OTAN, como pretexto para acusar de «crime de guerra» os russos, tal como fizeram noutros casos. 

- Neste caso em particular, serve também como distração do enorme fiasco que tem sido a «ofensiva» das tropas de Kiev, com imensas baixas e destruição de muitos dos veículos blindados e tanques, fornecidos pelos ocidentais.

Continua o coro de falsas indignações e de acusações baseadas em mentiras. Porém, não se vê qualquer retração, quer oficial, quer de órgãos ditos de «informação». A media ocidental tem feito uma campanha distorcendo os factos e aceitando como verdades a propaganda de Kiev.  

Abaixo, uma listagem (incompleta) das distorções propagandísticas do ocidente sobre o que se passa no terreno: 

- Bucha (uma «falsa bandeira»: atribuição aos russos de massacre efetuado por tropas ucranianas); 

- Mariupol (a maternidade que afinal tinha sido esvaziada de pacientes e foi transformada em bastião das tropas de Kiev); 

- O ataque à ponte da Crimeia (um ataque terrorista de um comando de sabotagem Kiev, efetuado com o apoio e colaboração das forças especiais de comandos britânicos); 

- Os ataques com mísseis, bombas e drones a uma cidade russa, sem qualquer interesse militar; os ataques com drones a Moscovo, não apenas o Kremlin, como a bairros periféricos exclusivamente residenciais, 

- A destruição do Nordstream II atribuída aos russos, pelos ocidentais (agora, o regime de Kiev reivindica como seu feito, mas terá sido em coordenação com os EUA e outros países da OTAN.)

Tudo é distorcido para as forças armadas russas aparecerem como os «bárbaros» e os «criminosos de guerra». 

PS1: Além da catástrofe ambiental, causada pelo bombardeamento do exército de Kiev (equipado, treinado e dirigido pela OTAN), há a contabilizar as consequências da falta de água para o arrefecimento da central nuclear de Zaporoijia, a maior central nuclear europeia, a jusante da barragem de Kakhovka. Esta central nuclear está sob controlo russo.   

GUERRA NUCLEAR, COLAPSO DA DÍVIDA & ESGOTAMENTO DA ENERGIA

QUAL DOS TRÊS IRÁ ACABAR COM O MUNDO, TAL COMO O CONHECEMOS?

 https://goldswitzerland.com/will-nuclear-war-debt-collapse-or-energy-depletion-finish-the-world/

Veja o artigo abaixo, escrito por Egon von Greyerz, alguém com um profundo conhecimento dos mercados e que tem um grande realismo. Ele não esconde o seu pessimismo, pois, de facto, a paisagem político-económica global é muito escura!

................................................................

WILL NUCLEAR WAR, DEBT COLLAPSE OR ENERGY DEPLETION FINISH THE WORLD?

written by Egon von Greyerz | February 16, 2023

Fragility has probably never been greater in history. Just three words encapsulate the destiny of the world.

The THREE words are: WAR, DEBT, ENERGY

A FOURTH word will financially save the ones who understand its significance. It will also play a major role in the world’s future monetary system. The word is obviously GOLD. As the world moves from a fragile debt based Western system to a commodity and energy based system in the East and South, gold will assume a strategic role in the monetary system.

WAR – WWIII

War is obviously a potentially catastrophic threat since the sheer existence of the world and mankind is now at maximum risk. Wars are horrible whoever starts them. Since the beginning of mankind there have probably been over 100,000 important wars and conflicts.

Wars are horrible whoever starts them. Most wars end in major fatalities and injuries and a massive human and financial cost. And at the end of the war, the situation is often worse than when it started, like in for example Afghanistan, Vietnam, Iraq and Libya which countries the US invaded unprovoked. The same will most probably be the case in Ukraine.

There are always two sides to a war. I learnt many years ago that before we judge someone, we must walk three moon laps in his moccasins.

So let us first walk in Putin’s moccasins.

The whole West hates Russia and have personalised it to Putin. Few realise that many of the people behind Putin are extreme hardliners and much more dangerous. Historically, Ukraine (like many European countries) has had a motley existence. Since the late 1700s to 1991 Ukraine was part of Russia / Soviet Union with a brief interruption after the Bolshevik revolution in 1917.

After the Maidan Revolution in Ukraine in 2014, the Minsk agreement brokered by Germany and France stipulated that parts of the Donbas region should be granted self-government. There should also be a ceasefire and withdrawal of heavy weapons by the Ukrainians. The Minsk agreement was never honoured and Ukraine continued to kill over 20,000 Russians in the region and to bomb the Donbas. As the bombing intensified in early February 2022, (allegedly at the insistence of the US), Russia invaded Ukraine on February 24, 2022.

So the above is how Russia and Putin sees the Ukrainian situation.

Wearing America’s moccasins, the US Neocons are extremely worried about losing the US hegemony. Since WWII, the US has basically failed with every war they have been involved in. But in their view, if they fail in the present conflict, that will be the end of US  dominance both politically and financially.

Ukraine is clearly just a pawn in a much bigger game between the two titans – USA and Russia. 

I watched Zelensky’s latest speech live to UK parliamentarians where he was begging for planes, weapons and money. This is obviously the role of a defending leader although he is clearly sacrificing hi people.

But wars are really really bizarre. Clapping every sentence that Zelensky uttered about the evil Russian invaders were around 1,000 politicians whose British ancestors, over a 400 year period, had invaded, conquered and ruled over 400 million people and 25% of the world’s landmass including major parts of Asia, Australia, Africa, Middle East and America. But today the shoe is on the other foot.

Politicians are masters at throwing stones whilst sitting in glass houses.

But wars are always about CONSEQUENCES. It is clearat this pointthat the West is sadly ignoring the potential consequences of this war as they keep sending money and weapons but no peace makers. The US has no desire for peace at this stage and Europe just follows blindly whatever the US initiates without thinking of the consequences which both economically and militarily are much graver for Europe.

Zelensky has asked for tanks and is getting them. He is now asking for planes which the NATO countries are also considering. There are not yet any NATO troops in Ukraine officially but it is clear that there are many NATO soldiers there without the official uniforms. An Austrian colonel confirms that if a NATO solider takes off his uniform, he is a mercenary and this seems how NATO sends troops to Ukraine unofficially. Also the Mozart group led by a retired US Marine Corps Colonel  acts in Ukraine as mercenaries.

So what is clear that there are not only NATO weapons in Ukraine but also soldiers. This by definition is as close to WWIII as the world can get.

It seems very unlikely that Russia will lose this war with their military superiority. Even with major additional help from NATO, Ukraine is unlikely to stand a chance.

If NATO decides to escalate the war with major troops and equipment, not only Russia will respond strongly but possibly also China and maybe India and Korea.

But there are clearly only losers in a nuclear war.

If that happens, major parts of the world and population will be gone and we won’t have to worry about deficits and debts or stocks and gold.

Let’s hope that world leaders and the ones pulling their strings come to their senses.

DEBT BUBBLE

According to Genesis in the Bible, Nimrod (grandson of Noah) built the Tower of Babel. The Babylonians desire was to make it “with its top in the heavens”. But god punished them for this deed, stopped the construction and scattered the people all around the world. Before that point spoke the same language but thereafter they all spoke different languages so they couldn’t understand each other.

Since then Central Bankers have built themselves towers or structures which haven’t quite reached heaven but both their aspirations and the money they have printed probably have.

What will pull these buildings down will probably not be the wrath of god but the wrath of the people as they realise that these monuments are a sign of bankers’ hubris based on fake money. And this fake money has not just built grandiose buildings like the Bank of International Settlement – BIS – tower in Babel Basel or the Eccles building that houses the FED in Washington.

No, fake money has also built astounding wealth for the top few percent of wealthy people and impoverished the rest.

The French Revolution in the late 18^th century or the Russian Revolution in 1917 were caused by significantly smaller differences between the rich and the poor than today.

The poverty & famine which many people in the world are already experiencing will in coming years/decades likely cause social unrest and revolutions on a major scale. In the last quarter, civil unrest rose in over 100 countries and more than 30 countries are currently at war. A collapse of the financial system which is less stable than a House of Cards will obviously exacerbate the situation and could easily cause major upheaval in many parts of the world.

GLOBAL DEBT BUBBLE OF $2.3 QUADRILLION

As I have outlined in many articles, these towers mentioned above have been instrumental in creating a global debt bubble of $300 trillion plus derivatives and unfunded liabilities of around $2 quadrillion, most of which will turn into debt in the next decade or less.

So even if the world can avoid a major nuclear war,  it is likely to suffer massive repercussions from the financial calamity coming next.

As Gandhi said:

“THERE IS SUFFICIENCY IN THE WORLD FOR

MAN’S NEED BUT NOT FOR HIS GREED.”

To create $2.3 quadrillion of global liabilities has nothing to do with man’s need but only with the greed of a few at the expense of mankind.

When the nuclear financial bubble bursts in the next few years, we will see an implosion of asset prices in real terms by 75-90% as I have outlined in many articles like here. LINK

In my article “IN THE END THE $ GOES TO ZERO AND THE US DEFAULTS” , LINK, I also explain that “there is no means of avoiding the final collapse of a boom brought about by credit expansion” as von Mises stated.

So even if the world survives the threat of a nuclear war, a collapse of the financial system is absolutely inevitable. The greed and the adoration of the golden calf that some parts of the world have practised in the last 50 years, will not go unpunished.

This major transformation coming will be like a financial nuclear event. After a difficult transition, the world will not only come out of it with a much sounder foundation but also based on much better human values than currently.

OIL – ENERGY

As the world moves from a debt based and fake money system to a much sounder one, resting on real values, especially energy and other commodities, the balance of power will continuously shift from West to East and South.

I outlined in this article, the decline of the West and the rise of the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa),  the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and the Eurasia Economic Union.

The final move down of the dollar is likely to involve a US default even though the US hubris will prevent them from using that word. It will instead be called a reset but the whole world will know that this disorderly reset will involve the US currency having lost all of its value.

The Fed will obviously invent a new digital currency that the rest of the world should not touch with a barge pole. Remember that the dollar, like most currencies, has already lost 98% since 1971. But the final 2% fall represents a 100% fall from today.

Throughout history the same total destruction has happened to every currency. Hubristic governments and central bankers clearly deserve this punishment. But sadly it is always the undeserved people who will suffer the most.

ENERGY

Another major economic crisis for the world is the contracting energy system.

The world economy is driven by energy. Without sufficient energy the living standards would decline dramatically. Currently fossil fuels account for 83% of the world’s energy. The heavy dependence on fossil fuels is unlikely to change in the next few decades.

The scale shows billion tonnes of oil equivalent energy.

As the graph shows, the energy derived from fossil fuels has declined for the last few years. This trend will accelerate over the next 20+ years as the availability of fossil fuels decline and the cost increases. The economic cost of producing energy has gone up 5X since 1980.

What very few people realise is that the world’s prosperity does not improve with more debt but with more and cheaper energy.

But sadly as the graph above shows, energy production is going to decline for at least 20 years.

Less energy means lower prosperity for the world. And remember that this is in addition to a major decline in prosperity due to the implosion of the financial system and asset values.

The graph above shows that energy from fossil fuels will decline by 18% between 2021 and 2040. But although Wind & Solar will proportionally increase, it will in no way compensate for the fall in fossil fuels. For renewable energy to make up the difference, it would need to increase by 900% with an investment exceeding $100 trillion.  This is highly unlikely since the production of Wind & Solar are heavily dependent on fossil fuels.

Another major problem is that there is no efficient method for storing Renewable energy.

Let’s just take the example of getting enough energy from batteries. The world’s largest battery factory is the Tesla Giga factory. The annual total output from this factory would produce 3 minutes of the annual US electricity demand. Even with 1,000 years of battery production, the batteries from this factory would produce only 2 days of US electricity demand.

So batteries will most probably not be a viable source of energy for decades especially since they need fossil fuels to be produced and charged.

Nuclear energy is the best available option today. But the time and cost of producing nuclear means that it will not be a viable alternative for decades. Also, many countries have stopped nuclear energy for political reasons. The graph above shows that nuclear and hydro will only increase very marginally in the next 20 years.

Of course the world wants to achieve cleaner and more efficient energy. But today we don’t have the means to produce this energy in quantity from anything but fossil fuels.

So stopping or reducing the production of fossil fuels, which is the desire of many politicians and climate activists, is guaranteed to substantially exacerbate the decline of the world economy.

We might get cleaner air but many would have to enjoy it in caves with little food or other  necessities and conveniences that we have today.

So what is clear is that the world is not prepared for even the best scenario energy case which entails a major decline in the standard to living in the next 20-30 years at least.

GOLD

Digital currencies are the perfect means for controlling the people in a totalitarian world. It gives Big Brother total power in relation to the people’s money. They can be taxed, fined or directed by any whim of the government. This would include arbitrary taxation or confiscation.

Thus CBDCs (Central Bank Digital Currencies) are a total disaster in relation to personal freedom. But in many countries the serfs have already been trained for this. Take Sweden where cash hardly exists and credit cards are used for all spending, even buying a newspaper or a loaf of bread. Most shops don’t even accept cash.

Thus the placid Swedes would happily hand over control over their money to the government, totally oblivious of the consequences.

As a lover of freedom, I would hate to live under such circumstances even though I was born in Sweden and really like many aspects of this country.

The people will not have a vote on digital money in any country just like they have no say when their leaders start a war. Personally I would do everything to avoid such oppressive circumstances but I do realise that it would be difficult for most people. 

With the coming fall of the dollar and many other currencies, as well as the end of the petrodollar, gold is likely to play a major role in the monetary system dominated by the East and South.

With government spending out of control in most countries, gold is the only currency you can trust just as it has been for 1,000s of years.

The BRICS, with China, Russia and India as major gold countries, are likely to make gold an important part of the future monetary system.

Gold is not for investment or speculation.

Gold is insurance and wealth preservation.

Gold is saving and financial survival.

2023 is likely to be the year of gold. Both fundamentally and technically gold looks like it will make major up moves this year. Any correction must be used to accumulate. Much better to buy low than on breakouts.

But please buy only physical gold and store it in a safe jurisdiction away from kleptocratic governments.

Guerra da Ucrânia no Don, Estratégia da Rússia, Deriva da OTAN para Guerra Nuclear

Senador Richard Black entrevistado por Eva Bartlett (jornalista presente no Don)

Há um punhado de homens e mulheres, com altos cargos de senadores ou representantes, que dizem a realidade aos seus concidadãos. Infelizmente, mesmo no seu próprio país, são pouco divulgadas as suas posições. Tenho consideração pela retidão moral e coragem dos que tive oportunidade de ouvir em entrevistas, nomeadamente, o Coronel McGregor, a ex-representante (Democrata) Tulsi Gabbard, o Coronel e Senador Richard Black.

Este último, dá uma entrevista, onde esclarece a verdade do que se tem passado na Ucrânia, desde o golpe de Maidan de 2014. Oxalá que as pessoas comecem a acordar e percebam como têm sido submersas num monstruoso cortejo de mentiras, propaladas pelos meios de «informação» (de propaganda, na realidade) do Ocidente.

                                           https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ys_lI6mXA_c